The global cosmetic industry is a complex and rapidly growing landscape where regulatory compliance is fundamental in ensuring product safety, efficacy, and market access. As cosmetic products cross borders, manufacturers must comply with country-specific regulations from ingredients safety to product labeling. These regulations protect consumers and set the standards that businesses must follow to enter the market and ensure compliance with product development guidelines. Understanding these differences, however, is essential for any company looking for a global distribution channel and for consumers who want to know what standards protect them.
A Global Perspective: Key Regulatory Bodies
As a general overview, the international regulation of cosmetics is primarily guided by international standards bodies, such as the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and the World Health Organization (WHO). The ISO sets global standards for cosmetic products, including ISO 22716, which establishes Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) for cosmetic production. The International Cooperation on Cosmetics Regulation (ICCR) is a voluntary group of countries, including the United States, the European Union, and Japan, whose regulatory authorities work together to harmonize regulations by creating common guidelines for the cosmetics industry and information sharing. These international organizations, including the World Health Organization (WHO), which provides guidelines regarding the safety and quality of cosmetics, lay the foundation for global regulation of cosmetics while allowing individual countries to establish their specific requirements based on regional priorities and concerns.
The EU Comprehensive Approach
The cornerstone of EU cosmetic legislation is Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009, which unifies rules across EU member states while outlining clear criteria for placing cosmetic products on the market. This regulation includes comprehensive provisions covering pre-market notification through the Cosmetic Product Notification Portal (CPNP), safety assessments through Cosmetic Product Safety Reports (CPSR), extensive lists of banned and restricted ingredients, and specific requirements for responsible persons within the EU to ensure regulatory compliance. According to EU regulations, a Responsible Person is designated for each cosmetic product, and they are responsible for ensuring that all of the legal requirements associated with that product, including Good Manufacturing Practices (GMPs), product safety assessments, notification procedures, and labeling processes, are carried out. The Responsible Person serves as the primary liaison between regulatory authorities and consumers, ensuring transparency and regulatory accountability.
Regulatory Developments in the U.S.
At present, the cosmetic regulatory landscape in the US is in a state of transformation due to the recent enactment of the Modernization of Cosmetics Regulation Act of 2022 (MoCRA). This law marks the expansion of Food and Drug Administration jurisdiction over cosmetics since the 1938 Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, thereby, fulfilling longstanding gaps in the oversight systems. Manufacturers and processors must now register with the FDA annually, enhancing regulatory oversight and enabling quicker responses to safety concerns.
Under the new regulations, every cosmetic product marketed in the U.S. must be registered with the F.D.A. by its responsible person and submit ingredient listings and annual updates. The FDA is now authorized to suspend a facility registration if the FDA determines that a cosmetic product may cause serious adverse health effects due to production problems; other products from that facility could also be similarly affected by production problems.
U.S. cosmetic regulation is further complicated by state-level laws, which often impose stricter requirements than federal standards. Examples of state initiatives that often exceed federal standards in their stringency include the California Safe Cosmetics Act (Senate Bill 484) and Washington’s Toxic-Free Cosmetics Act (HB 1047). These laws create a complex compliance environment for brands operating across multiple U.S. states, as companies must navigate both federal regulations and varying state-specific requirements.
Japan’s Regulatory Framework
In Japan, the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW) is responsible for cosmetic products. Japan classifies cosmetic products under two main categories, “cosmetics” and “quasi-drugs”. Quasi-drugs have a more pronounced effect than standard cosmetics but fall short of being classified as medicines. Manufacturers must submit pre-market registration documentation to the Pharmaceutical and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) for approval. Once registered and approved, these quasi-drug status products receive specific labeling to indicate their status. Product labels must be written entirely in Japanese, with all information specified by regulations; this ensures transparency for Japanese consumers while upholding high safety standards.
ASEAN Cosmetic Regulations
The ASEAN Cosmetic Directive (ACD), which is based on the EU cosmetics regulation, unifies ASEAN’s cosmetic laws. This directive addresses specifications like labeling, ingredient limitations, and product safety. The directive also covers herbal cosmetics, ensuring their compliance with safety and quality standards. The ACD ensures product safety and quality across ASEAN nations while facilitating free trade and reducing regulatory barriers. The EU’s cosmetics regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 serves as the foundation for the ACD, which addresses ingredient restrictions, product safety, and labeling.
India's Cosmetic Regulatory Standards
Cosmetics in India are regulated under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, and the Cosmetics Rules, 2020. The Central Drugs Standard Control Organization (CDSCO) is India’s regulatory authority that grants Import Registration Certificates and oversees all aspects of cosmetic imports into the country. At the state level, State Licensing Authorities issue manufacturing licenses and oversee compliance.
While the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) sets standards for different categories of cosmetics, the task of enforcement and regulation is mainly done by the CDSCO. Labeling and packaging must comply with the Cosmetics Rules, 2020, the Legal Metrology (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 2011, and BIS standards. All cosmetic products must comply with these labeling requirements before being placed on the Indian market.
Conclusion
The regulatory environment for cosmetics around the world demonstrates various approaches for maintaining a balance between innovation, market access, and consumer protection. Successfully navigating these regulatory environments requires careful planning, a robust understanding of target markets, and flexible product development. As scientific knowledge of what is being used advances and consumer demand for safety and transparency grows, industry participants will need to stay up to date on global regulatory developments as regulatory frameworks continue to change. In this evolving landscape, a strong understanding of global cosmetic regulations is a crucial competitive advantage for businesses.
In addition to providing regulatory and pharmacovigilance services for global customers, DDReg Pharma offers specialized clinical regulatory services to assist with Clinical Trial Applications in Europe. For further information, connect with our experts. Read more from the experts about the new Clinical Trial Regulations here: Complying with Safety Reporting Requirements in the EU’s CTD to CTR Transition